Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch
Holy shit.
The fact that this woman was called to testify is conclusive proof that the "prosecutor" threw the case. And that would be true even if she weren't an obvious liar. Why would any prosecutor call a purely exculpatory witness to a grand jury proceeding?
|
I mean, we kind of knew that he tanked the case from the lack of indictment and his own description of the decidedly abnormal approach he took.
But this takes that cake. This woman sure looks like she was lying, and like the prosecutor knew or should have known that.
