LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 108
0 members and 108 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-07-2015, 05:29 PM   #9
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Re: Is Ted Cruz Satan? Discuss.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidd Finch View Post
I'll leave aside the "bomb the poor" silliness.
I was being silly, and thought that was clear. But I also do not believe that Republican domestic or foreign policy is driven by a deep and abiding love for free markets -- I think that love for free markets is instrumental and convenient, and easily abandoned for other loves.

Quote:
Instead, I would guess that both you and GGG have supported sanctions, versus the transformative power of a business relationship, in certain instances, in particular instances -- especially with respect to apartheid South Africa. So you and I could be accused of the same flip-flop as the GOP is engaging in, by supporting that sort of engagement with respect to Iran (and Cuba).

So, why? What makes these cases different?
Not following where I've flip-flopped. In general, I think economic incentives are a more powerful incentive to get people to do what you want them to do than bombing them is. I think we consistently overestimate just how helpful bombing will be in accomplishing our goals, though I also think some people in our society (e.g., rhymes with Thrill Pistol) just groove on bombing people.

Quote:
For Cuba, it's that sanctions failed, the country poses no threat, and there is a real opportunity for constructive engagement through business and capitalism, because they might benefit the Cuban people broadly (and there's the leadership-transition issue).

For Iran, it's different. Sanctions actually worked there, and brought the regime to a point of wanting to make concessions. Just because sanctions have worked, doesn't mean that more sanctions is the right call; instead, we should reap the benefit here. If this deal closes, Iran will be further away from acquiring nukes than it is now (or was 8 years ago), and a verification regime will be in place. But the regime's power is such that I doubt we'll see a broad beneficial effect to capitalist engagement.
Also, in Iran, we managed multilateral sanctions, which worked in a big way. In Cuba, not so much. I hear a lot of Canadians are unhappy now that they'll be vacationing with Americans in Cuba.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:45 PM.