Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sidd Finch  I'll leave aside the "bomb the poor" silliness. | 
	
 I was being silly, and thought that was clear.  But I also do not believe that Republican domestic or foreign policy is driven by a deep and abiding love for free markets -- I think that love for free markets is instrumental and convenient, and easily abandoned for other loves.
	Quote:
	
	
		| Instead, I would guess that both you and GGG have supported sanctions, versus the transformative power of a business relationship, in certain instances, in particular instances -- especially with respect to apartheid South Africa.  So you and I could be accused of the same flip-flop as the GOP is engaging in, by supporting that sort of engagement with respect to Iran (and Cuba). 
 So, why?  What makes these cases different?
 | 
	
 Not following where I've flip-flopped.  In general, I think economic incentives are a more powerful incentive to get people to do what you want them to do than bombing them is.  I think we consistently overestimate just how helpful bombing will be in accomplishing our goals, though I also think some people in our society (e.g., rhymes with Thrill Pistol) just groove on bombing people.
	Quote:
	
	
		| For Cuba, it's that sanctions failed, the country poses no threat, and there is a real opportunity for constructive engagement through business and capitalism, because they might benefit the Cuban people broadly (and there's the leadership-transition issue). 
 For Iran, it's different.  Sanctions actually worked there, and brought the regime to a point of wanting to make concessions.  Just because sanctions have worked, doesn't mean that more sanctions is the right call; instead, we should reap the benefit here.  If this deal closes, Iran will be further away from acquiring nukes than it is now (or was 8 years ago), and a verification regime will be in place.  But the regime's power is such that I doubt we'll see a broad beneficial effect to capitalist engagement.
 | 
	
 Also, in Iran, we managed multilateral sanctions, which worked in a big way.  In Cuba, not so much.  I hear a lot of Canadians are unhappy now that they'll be vacationing with Americans in Cuba.