LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 111
0 members and 111 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 04-14-2016, 10:53 AM   #4636
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Hilary had nothing to do with UBS

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxwonk View Post
I don't believe I ever actually said I was going to vote for Bernie. I merely said that, at a given point in time, he had some ideas I found more appealing than Hilary's on some issues I feel strongly about. If Hils can't win me over by November, my vote, which will be utterly meaningless no matter who I cast it for, down here in the belly of Southern Coastal Georgia, will be cast for either Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, or Jed Bartlett.
To be clear, I'm fine with people voting for Bernie who think he is the better candidate. I'm not fine with people doing the endless insubstantial smear on Hillary Clinton. It stunk when Gingrich did it, it stuck when Citizen's United did it, it stunk when Issa did it, and it stinks when Bernie supporters do it.

You looked at the UBS issue, one of the smears popular among the Berning Men, and concluded it was hokum, but then focused on pinning stuff relating to JP Morgan Chase on her. And from what you said about it, it all sounded like a bunch of thin reeds dealing with something well outside her portfoilo.

Vote for who you want. Waste your vote. But lay off the Citizens United echo chamber against Hill.
__________________
A wee dram a day!

Last edited by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy; 04-14-2016 at 10:59 AM..
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.