|
Re: Objectively intelligent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Looks that way.
1. It's state level (B Team);
2. It's a new version of previously dismissed charges as to several Defendants;
3. Facts are really old -- significantly decreases dependability/veracity of witnesses
But one question I have is, why did they dismiss without prejudice and refile rather than just issue superseding indictments? That makes the whole thing look pretty flawed. I don't know about you, but if I'm on a jury and someone tells me the prosecution previously dropped the charges, I'm thinking there's something lacking here, and the defendants charged twice are being unfairly forced to pay for counsel and go through the process twice.
|
What are the charges against him? The article I saw did not say.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
