LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 209
0 members and 209 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-10-2021, 06:48 PM   #4884
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 32,941
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
That's a facile analogy. A more honest one would be having an incredibly complex event that hasn't occurred in a century unfold, responding to it in a manner that was flawed in some regards, not flawed in others, and then being excoriated for everything you fucked up, regardless of whether it was deserved (which some of it very much is) or not (which some of it is). Oh, wait -- that's not an analogy.

Trump's politicizing the pandemic was inexcusable. His Administration's action in response to it, however, is a different thing. These things can and should be separated. I'd give the Administration a C+ for its handling. And I don't think an A is possible in a free country even approaching our size (see Germany). Trump I give an F, or an incomplete. Whatever good he might've done he more than offset with his politicizing of the crisis.
So you're saying, it's like when a two-time loser and failed blogger cheats at golf, and people say, well, he is a two-loser and he failed at blogger, and he cheats, but his score isn't that bad.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar

Last edited by Tyrone Slothrop; 06-10-2021 at 06:50 PM..
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 AM.