Stuck on Repeats

[Shape Shifter]

Originally Posted by dtb

1. Border towns in mid-July experience quite a bit of hot-as-hell weather.

2. Said border towns are not exactly vegetarian meccas.

Who knew?

Are these the reactionary Michigan border towns that Hank keeps bragging about?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Rip this off, Hank.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Rip this off, Hank.

Oh the irony.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Rip this off, Hank.

that's a main stage, which means each story would have been edited with an experienced producer. it's likely lots of others there would have liked the fat guy's story- but I've never gone to one.

but my thing is slams, which is 10 random people called from the audience- it's a whole different thing.

and I didn't mean to rip off your shell link. I assumed most people knew you linked it first, confusing PB and FB. I only posted my entry, but still, I am sorry.

[ABBAKiss]

Originally Posted by Fugee

Amy Sohn was the GA/Lawtalker who had oral sex with a gay guy in the back of a cab??

I may be wonking here, but, ahem, that was me.

[Fugee]

Originally Posted by ABBAKiss

I may be wonking here, but, ahem, that was me.

More like a little whiff. I forget who it was but knew it wasn't Amy whatshername. It was my lame joke.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by Fugee

More like a little whiff. I forget who it was but knew it wasn't Amy whatshername. It was my lame joke.

Can one whiff on a whiff? I'm pretty sure ABBA knew that and was just bragging.

[Fugee]

Originally Posted by Adder

Can one whiff on a whiff? I'm pretty sure ABBA knew that and was just bragging.

If anyone can, it would be me.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Please welcome Brittany Santos (even if her mug ain't that great).

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1163

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1164

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1165

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=1166

TM

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

There is no one on this board who would say they wouldn't fuck this woman. That would be like someone saying it wouldn't bother them if his wife was confiding all of her deep dark secrets and desires in some other guy.

TM

I would absolutely say that. (It would be entirely incorrect, but I've said far more ludicrous things.)

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

You missed nothing. Thurgreed's referring to an ancient controversy where I staked out the position that there's no such thing as an "emotional affair" because no one's ever felt their spouse was having one when the confidante was same-sex.

Or something. I can't really remember, except that it amuses Thurgreed to bring it up now and again to demonstrate that I'm deluded, which seems like a longer putt than is necessary to prove THAT point.

I agree with you, but find your basis lacking. There is no emotional affair because if someone else agrees to take on all the emotional discussion while someone else gets the sex, the former isn't the "other man." He's the girl-friend-with-a-penis.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Sidd Finch

I doubt that there is any remotely serious competition.

She was also a ballerina, so in terms of stamina and flexibility, she'd own just about every guy here in the sack. (Probably cause a few to have strokes.)

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

I'd like to hear what Sebastian has to say about this: http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/12...sed/?hpt=hp_t1

Paterno and everyone else involved in that mess are awful, terrible people. Just disgusting.

TM

I don't have a defense for the old man anymore. The Freeh Report forecloses them all. He was a megalomaniac, and a pathetic one at that. He put the program, and a competition to outlast Bowden and grab the wins title, above ongoing molestation of kids in school facilities.

Take the statue down and start anew.

But I still don't think the players should suffer the death penalty for the coaches' and administration's actions. That seems unfair to kids who probably thought they were joining a uniquely ethical program, and did nothing wrong.

[dtb]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

I would absolutely say that. (It would be entirely incorrect, but I've said far more ludicrous things.)

They grow up so fast. Sniff.


On an unrelated note, the Australian doctor from House is so dreamy. So cliche, but I can't help it. DREEE-MEEE.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

Um, both are good. Is either/or the only option?

For purposes of allowing Adder and Hank to disagree on 100% of things, yes, they are mutually exclusive. Observe the fiction it may either be internal or external, but never both, or move to another discussion.