LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=840)

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 06-16-2009 05:42 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 392691)
I'm pissed that Stallworth got 30 days for killing someone when driving drunk, while Vick has to fight tooth and nail for his life and career to not be completely over. Wtf?

Putting aside Vick, which is a whole other story, wasn't the victim walking across the middle of a highway/freeway early in the morning, against the light, and so forth? In other words, if Stallworth weren't drunk he wouldn't have been charged with anything. Of course, if Stallworth weren't drunk he might have avoided him, but it wasn't a reckless rampage.

Hank Chinaski 06-16-2009 05:45 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 392692)
I have to admit that I didn't look at her face until after Gwink mentioned it.

you have a thing for forearms? elbows?

Adder 06-16-2009 05:47 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski (Post 392695)
you have a thing for forearms? elbows?

For some reason, my attention was drawn elsewhere.

Also, I think she is pretty attractive overall, and think Gwink was a bit uncharitable, but I am not a fan of the tattoo.

greatwhitenorthchick 06-16-2009 05:48 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Adder (Post 392692)
I have to admit that I didn't look at her face until after Gwink mentioned it.

Why do you have to admit this? Does someone have a gun to your head?

Adder 06-16-2009 05:51 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 392698)
Why do you have to admit this? Does someone have a gun to your head?

Because if I didn't I would have to work instead. So, basically, yes.

Hank Chinaski 06-16-2009 05:59 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 392698)
Why do you have to admit this? Does someone have a gun to your head?

Canadians have such a distorted view of how frequently firearms play into day to day life in america.

ThurgreedMarshall 06-16-2009 06:03 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) (Post 392694)
Putting aside Vick, which is a whole other story, wasn't the victim walking across the middle of a highway/freeway early in the morning, against the light, and so forth? In other words, if Stallworth weren't drunk he wouldn't have been charged with anything. Of course, if Stallworth weren't drunk he might have avoided him, but it wasn't a reckless rampage.

"After a night drinking at a bar in Miami Beach’s Fountainebleau hotel, police said Stallworth hit Reyes, a construction crane operator who was rushing to catch a bus after finishing his shift around 7:15 a.m. Stallworth told police he flashed his lights in an attempt to warn Reyes, who was not in a crosswalk when he was struck.

Stallworth had a blood-alcohol level of .126 after the crash, well above Florida’s .08 limit."

I would imagine that it would have occurred to him that hitting the brakes, as opposed to say...flashing his brights, would be a better idea if he wasn't drunk. But at least he pulled over and called the cops afterwards. And 7:15 isn't "early in the morning" in the sense you seem to be using it. There had to have been plenty of light by then.

TM

Hank Chinaski 06-16-2009 06:34 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 392701)
"After a night drinking at a bar in Miami Beach’s Fountainebleau hotel, police said Stallworth hit Reyes, a construction crane operator who was rushing to catch a bus after finishing his shift around 7:15 a.m. Stallworth told police he flashed his lights in an attempt to warn Reyes, who was not in a crosswalk when he was struck.

Stallworth had a blood-alcohol level of .126 after the crash, well above Florida’s .08 limit."

I would imagine that it would have occurred to him that hitting the brakes, as opposed to say...flashing his brights, would be a better idea if he wasn't drunk. But at least he pulled over and called the cops afterwards. And 7:15 isn't "early in the morning" in the sense you seem to be using it. There had to have been plenty of light by then.

TM

victim's family got a "substantial" amount of cash as settlement, which maybe played a part in making the plea go down so easy.

Cletus Miller 06-16-2009 06:38 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 392701)
"After a night drinking at a bar in Miami Beach’s Fountainebleau hotel, police said Stallworth hit Reyes, a construction crane operator who was rushing to catch a bus after finishing his shift around 7:15 a.m. Stallworth told police he flashed his lights in an attempt to warn Reyes, who was not in a crosswalk when he was struck.

Stallworth had a blood-alcohol level of .126 after the crash, well above Florida’s .08 limit."

I would imagine that it would have occurred to him that hitting the brakes, as opposed to say...flashing his brights, would be a better idea if he wasn't drunk. But at least he pulled over and called the cops afterwards. And 7:15 isn't "early in the morning" in the sense you seem to be using it. There had to have been plenty of light by then.

TM

There's plenty of precedent for NFL drunk drivers receiving little punishment after killing people. See Leonard Little:

"When tested, [Little's] blood alcohol level measured 0.19 percent, a level that exceeds the statutory level of intoxication of 0.08 in the state of Missouri. Little received 90 days in jail, four years probation and 1000 hours of community service."

Isn't (an unspoken) part of why Vick has been treated so harshly by the NFL b/c dogfighting also involves gambling? Isn't illegal gambling the NFL's biggest no-no?

I do think that the fact Vick served real prison time over some dogs, while Little and Stallworth (and many like them) get 90 days or whatever for recklessly killing a person is ridiculous. But that's not the NFL's responsibility.

LessinSF 06-16-2009 06:44 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick (Post 392686)
Thurgreed, that woman in the bottom picture is not pretty. Sorry.

I'm not sure she is a "woman" by any legal definition either.

Atticus Grinch 06-16-2009 07:06 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall (Post 392691)
I'm pissed that Stallworth got 30 days for killing someone when driving drunk, while Vick has to fight tooth and nail for his life and career to not be completely over. Wtf?

I know many people who have driven drunk. I'd wager it's close to 100% of us, Mormons excluded. So the only difference between Stallworth and 100% of non-Mormon board denizens is whether they actually killed someone rather than simply taking a reprehensible risk of killing someone. I don't know anyone who's ever made a stupid impulsive and impaired judgment to make an animal fight to the death for his own enjoyment. Well, not an animal that a DA and 12 jurors would think was too cute to die.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 06-16-2009 08:07 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 392709)
Well, not an animal that a DA and 12 jurors would think was too cute to die.

I would happily acquit anyone who staged a massive pit bull cage match in which only one pit bull in the world survived.

Hank Chinaski 06-16-2009 08:56 PM

Re: Fucking FDA
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch (Post 392709)
I know many people who have driven drunk. I'd wager it's close to 100% of us, Mormons excluded. So the only difference between Stallworth and 100% of non-Mormon board denizens is whether they actually killed someone rather than simply taking a reprehensible risk of killing someone. I don't know anyone who's ever made a stupid impulsive and impaired judgment to make an animal fight to the death for his own enjoyment. Well, not an animal that a DA and 12 jurors would think was too cute to die.

maybe not fight, but I guarantee GGG has caught flies and pulled the wings off

ltl/fb 06-16-2009 10:14 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
I will not have a full set of teeth before next week. And possibly not then. So the thread title is inapropos.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 06-16-2009 10:51 PM

Re: This is the thread where the fringster comes back with teeth
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ltl/fb (Post 392717)
I will not have a full set of teeth before next week. And possibly not then. So the thread title is inapropos.

The thread will be live for at least several more weeks.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com