| sebastian_dangerfield |
06-11-2009 12:00 PM |
Re: Hank's new fashion board
Quote:
Originally Posted by dtb
(Post 392331)
Two things:
- I'd leave off the last "to" in the first paragraph. Way funnier.
- 3M Brazilian? That's genius. I have a kind of technical question, though, about your word choice. Is it actually a Brazilian? I'd think it'd be more of an inner thigh waxing. But I don't have self-access to the equipment, so I don't know exactly where the tape goes. I'd rather not explain why I was asking to the owner of the equipment I do have access to.
|
As to 1, got it. Noted for future use of any similar phrases.
As to 2, it's not a Brazilian, but it's close enough for the purpose offered, and what's lost in clinical accuracy is more than compensated for in the sharp imagery packed into so few syllables.
(For clarity, in case you're running the picture in your head, it wouldn't be a full Brazilian. Assuming the subject were gifted with average to above average equipment, the tape would remove nothing in the front. The underside and back are back are different stories. You can run those images for yourself. I own the equipment at issue and I don't even like thinking about how that deforestation would go.) |
