LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 169
0 members and 169 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-15-2004, 09:48 PM   #4783
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Taj Mahal No More

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Maybe they won't have to agree. {Spree: brightest minds of the GOP think their way out of this particular wet paper bag.}
:eek2:

I would really hate to be the counsel on the committee that has to say to his member, with a straight face, that the law is constitutional and consistent with our system of checks and balances. A statute that allows Congress to overrule a judicial decision? It didn't even work with the executive. cough, Chadha, cough.

What's next--every bill comes along with jurisdiction-stripping language tacked on to prevent its challenge in court?

[hint, atticus, that's rhetorical, please don't find such a proposal on google[
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM.