LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 99
0 members and 99 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-15-2004, 09:48 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Taj Mahal No More

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Maybe they won't have to agree. {Spree: brightest minds of the GOP think their way out of this particular wet paper bag.}
:eek2:

I would really hate to be the counsel on the committee that has to say to his member, with a straight face, that the law is constitutional and consistent with our system of checks and balances. A statute that allows Congress to overrule a judicial decision? It didn't even work with the executive. cough, Chadha, cough.

What's next--every bill comes along with jurisdiction-stripping language tacked on to prevent its challenge in court?

[hint, atticus, that's rhetorical, please don't find such a proposal on google[
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM.