LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 101
0 members and 101 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-06-2010, 12:29 PM   #988
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Vikki Blows

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
Who is this Vikki Blows woman and why isn't she a huge, huge star?



Click this link for the many photos of her FANTASTIC and nsfw breasteses: http://www.hotcelebshome.com/2009/12...ary-2010-nsfw/

TM
The pasty is preposterous. We all have nipples. If the rest of the breast is appropriate for exposure, I'm struggling to find a reason the female nipple should be uniquely excluded from the party.

ETA: If the law were at all logical, it would dictate that the female nipple is the only part of the breast allowed to be exposed and that the bulbous remainder of it, which is what makes it different from the male's otherwise similar anatomy, should be covered. This would lead to some odd swimwear and cumbersome evening attire, no doubt, but it would be consistent. The current law is ripe for constitutional challenge, IMHO.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 01-06-2010 at 12:42 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.