LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,152
0 members and 4,152 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 12-11-2019, 06:58 PM   #4750
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Where Was Air Force One Addressed in McCain Feingold?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
The President flies in Air Force One to accommodate the security requirements of the office and the people who need to travel with him for, e.g., national security reasons, regardless of the reason for the trip. I have no problem with it.
If I write the words, "How else would the President travel? He has to use AFO," would this not be saying the same thing? No. Of course it is saying the same thing.

If I note there’s another argument that it’s a perk, but I don’t attribute it to you, have I nevertheless attributed it to you because we’re having an exchange? No. Of course not.

So might I ask, how I have I not read what you wrote? Because it is indeed your point that due to security concerns, there is no other way for POTUS to fly that caused me - in agreement with that point - to respond that, where POTUS flies for political reasons, the DNC should receive compensation.

ETA: Trump is exploiting his position in using AFO for rallies. He’s enjoying the use for political gain with the insurmountable alibi that there’s no other way for him to travel. Giving the DNC the value of his trips seems sensible to address that abuse (which will otherwise persist indefinitely with every POTUS.)
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 12-11-2019 at 07:03 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 AM.