We are all Slave now.

[Adder]

I'm really starting to wonder what they are thinking. Maybe the latest allegations will change things (doubt it), but as is they are going to vote to confirm someone facing credible allegations of sexual misconduct who has, at minimum, lied to the Senate repeatedly. Then they're going to go run for reelection having to defend it.

Why? Reject this nominee and get another. Ram that one through before the election if you want, or ask the president to hold off naming a replacement until the lame duck, or get him to name someone you think you can run on.

Do they think their base being stoked they said f you to the PC police is really more valuable to them than the liability of having voted for this guy?

ETA: Oh, and sticking with this guy with half-assed document productions and essentially no investigation of misconduct just gives the Dems, should they take either house, something to investigate and (long shot) could wind up with him being removed later anyway.