Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
Since when does a person have to defend the inverse of his own argument? “You believe A; logically you should also believe Not-A” is Amateur Hour stuff. The answer is it would be an ethical breech to bring false charges just because you believe the jury will convict. Sheesh. If you or Sidd think that somehow proves something about what we’re talking about, you’re both nuts.
|
A weak case is not that same as false charges. Once again, you avoid the difficult questions and answer an easy one instead.
And it's not the inverse, it's exactly the same thing. You said:
Quote:
|
...I prefer it when local prosecutors bring charges when they believe they can get a conviction under the criminal statutes from a legally constituted jury, and don’t when they don’t.
|
Threaded Mode