Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
Since when does a person have to defend the inverse of his own argument? “You believe A; logically you should also believe Not-A” is Amateur Hour stuff. The answer is it would be an ethical breech to bring false charges just because you believe the jury will convict. Sheesh. If you or Sidd think that somehow proves something about what we’re talking about, you’re both nuts.
|
I wasn't saying "false" charges but rather weak charges. And, no, I was not suggesting that you would actually support such a decision.
I was suggesting that your view, that prosecutors should give consideration to whether a jurors are likely to ignore their oaths, is more closely related to that circumstance.
Threaded Mode