LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,318
0 members and 2,318 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-21-2020, 10:18 AM   #11
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,282
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Given his level of sophistication (Goldman, P/E, campaigns, bundling, etc.) and his wealth (his Seinfeld royalties [yes, he owns a slice of syndication rights] alone should be more than enough to survive quite well), if he was dumb or greedy enough to skim a foundation or PAC (don't know what the wall fund was), fuck him.

This isn’t politics. I don’t see a “process crime.” The charge is defalcation. And Barr allegedly signed off on it.

If it’s true, Bannon is an epic dumbass. If false, it may be political, but I see no evidence of that yet.
Did Barr sign off? I've read a lot of speculation that this particular investigation was the reason that Barr tried so hard to put a complete novice in the SDNY a few months ago.

There is a certain class of rich dude who never is rich enough. I imagine Bannon is one of those.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 AM.