LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,422
0 members and 2,422 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-20-2020, 07:16 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
I'm looking forward to Sebby's defense of Bannon.
Given his level of sophistication (Goldman, P/E, campaigns, bundling, etc.) and his wealth (his Seinfeld royalties [yes, he owns a slice of syndication rights] alone should be more than enough to survive quite well), if he was dumb or greedy enough to skim a foundation or PAC (don't know what the wall fund was), fuck him.

This isn’t politics. I don’t see a “process crime.” The charge is defalcation. And Barr allegedly signed off on it.

If it’s true, Bannon is an epic dumbass. If false, it may be political, but I see no evidence of that yet.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.