Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The "combatant" part seems like something of a stretch.
|
True.
It is a clever move by ICRC, though. Seems from the article that they're really more focused on the thousands of other detainees, and understood that the best way to get public attention on it was to shine the light on SH to show the logical flaws in perpetual detainment.
Actual question: Wouldn't SH get handed off to whatever Iraq organization that's been preparing for his trial, anyway? Or are we really thinking that we'll keep him until we're ready?
Threaded Mode