LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > Regional Forums > SF/SV

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,045
0 members and 2,045 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-25-2004, 12:57 PM   #11
Sidd Finch
I am beyond a rank!
 
Sidd Finch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,873
Just to liven things up . . . .

Quote:
Originally posted by HeadLight
Is the Peterson case going south ?
No idea, and no interest. The media event around this trial has all the redeeming qualities of slowing down to gawk at a fatal car accident.


Quote:
Is the masturbating Oklahoma judge guilty as charged?
Okay, that's some weird shit. But, as Mrs. Finch said, he [ital]is[/ital] just sitting there with nothing to do.


Quote:
Should failure to plead 17200 constitute malpractice?
Probably. Hard to imagine that this was a tactical decision; it looks like the just didn't consider the full range of claims. Given that the trial court (jury?) did determine that the plaintiffs had been stiffed on wages/overtime owed, this is a hell of a tough case for the defense. (For those who didn't read the article, the lawyers got their clients -- now their adversaries -- some 90 million for unpaid wages on a claim with a 3 year statute of limitations. If they'd used 17200, they could have extended that to 4 years, according to the malpractice suit.)

That said, the case law on 17200 has gone through a number of gyrations over the years and there may have been some obstacle to including it the claim. Though I can't think of what that would be, at least not till I finish my coffee.
Sidd Finch is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:23 AM.