Quote:
Shape Shifter
I'm sure it had nothing to do with his experience
|
You forgot to list his shoe size.
Nevertheless, as he clearly never intended to be an unbiased fact finder (for all of the reasons I've previously stated), but for his wife's connections, he would never have been considered for the job.
Quote:
|
Now let's get to the nitty-gritty: What would your reaction be if the criminal acts committed by the current administration had been committed by the Clinton White House?
|
If the acts committed were actually criminal, yes. But as you keep choosing not to acknowledge:
- In order for the alleged leakers to have violated the Intelligence Identities Protection Act, they would have to have known that [Plame] was covert and that the government was "taking affirmative measures to conceal" her relationship to the CIA. Novak's statement that the CIA made only "a very weak request" that he not use her name suggests the absence of such "affirmative measures," which would put the leakers in the clear legally if not politically.
Threaded Mode