LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 120
0 members and 120 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-15-2004, 02:54 PM   #11
Gattigap
Southern charmer
 
Gattigap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment
Posts: 7,033
Taj Mahal No More

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
At the risk of inspiring Not Me to post long quotations from case law in boldface, isn't it Con Law 101 that Congress can prescribe the jurisdiction of the Article III courts only to the extent it isn't granted to the Supreme Court in the Constitution --- i.e., they can only limit the J of courts they "ordain and establish," which is every federal court except the SCOTUS?

Which means if you yank the J of the District and Circuit courts, all you do is multiply the original proceedings in the SCOTUS?
Perhaps Smiling Tom is relying on the resulting backlog to push an actual hearing of a Jurisdiction Impacted Case back to say, 2015. Or he's betting that at such time, future Chief Justice Thomas will convince his colleagues consistently to deny cert.
__________________
I'm done with nonsense here. --- H. Chinaski
Gattigap is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 PM.