LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,159
0 members and 2,159 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-10-2004, 12:54 PM   #11
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
The "Keyes" to the election. Get it? [Chuckle, chuckle [snort]]

Quote:
Originally posted by SEC Issues
You probably want to be paying attention to this. Keyes is giving you a sneak preview of the future ontogeny of the pro-choice movement. With the growing realization that any philosophical position that is advanced in our society as the product of religious belief is self-limiting because it is advanced as the product of religious belief, the pro-choicers will now work to grow the next theme: The Fight For The Civil Rights Of Our Most Vulnerable. It's been easy so far for people to dismiss the religious justifications for the pro-choice argument when they conflict with a perceived Right of women, but it's going to be tougher if this gets successfully re-cast as two competing Rights.
Are you meaning to say "pro-life" rather than "pro-choice"?

Using the antonym of what you actually mean to say kind of undercuts your argument and makes you look like an idiot.
ltl/fb is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.