LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 163
0 members and 163 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-24-2004, 07:23 PM   #11
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
Blogs under fire

A few weeks ago, SHP posted a link to a http://cbftw.blogspot.com/, which is a war blog of a soldier stationed in Mosel. He started the blog earlier this summer, and said at some point that it was sort of an effort to fight off boredom. I think he also liked having it to remind him of what was going on. Frankly, his account of an attack in early August was terrifying to read, and I think he and all of his readers were greatly relieved that he survived intact.

Anyhow, NPR has a report today that war blogs in general, and cbftw's in particular, are now under scrutiny. A few days ago, cbftw posted the text of the first amendment, so I wasn't surprised to see that he's having to pass through the censors before he can post. I was glad, though, that these war blogs are getting media attention. I was afraid the media was going to catch on that their embedded reporters are second rate for first hand accounts if there are bloggers out there.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM.