Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
1. Dude, the function of a union is to protect jobs of its workers. What would you have them do? Take up expressive dance?
|
The point I was trying to make is that in general the policies the laws they push don't lead to increased growth. I think I showed that.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield 2. Businesses that falsify their numbers don't create growth. They create windfalls for their execs with options and shares. The regs and enforcement you're pissed about aren't a response to unbridled growth - they're a response (probably over-response) to fraud.
|
I am not pissed about all the regs and enforcement. I just don't like most of the ones the unoins push. Generally they just push for laws that restrict competition.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield 2.3. I view unions as the counterbalance to execs who have no interest but propping the numbers to get their bonus packages. Both are cabals of self serving, solely self interested whores. Together, they ass fuck companies exquisitely.
|
I don't necessarily disagree with that. It is just when the unions start lobbying for laws to protect their jobs. i.e. stopping free trade, telling Costco they can't sell food etc.
Quote:
|
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield 4. The present GOP is not supporting growth at all. What its doing is shoving short term gains into the pieholes of its biggest contributors. They're stripping the cash out businesses. But they don't care. When the whiplash tax increases of a liberal administration hit, they'll already be retired. Those of us in the middle will pay the tax bills when the unions and the lower middle class have their revenge. Same old story. The loathesome rich fight the loathesome poor, and the rest of us pay the tab for the damage.
|
By supporting free trade they are supporting growth.
Threaded Mode