LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 249
0 members and 249 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-28-2005, 04:10 PM   #11
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
Six Feet Under

Quote:
Originally posted by Penske_Account
I think I recall the interview and wasn't his use of glib as a challenge of Lauer's understanding (or lack thereof) of what he was talking about in relation to drugs prescribed for psychiatric maladies, i.e.:

glib


Showing little thought, preparation, or concern: a glib response to a complex question.

adj 1: marked by lack of intellectual depth; "glib generalizations"; "a glib response to a complex question"


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=glib
Glib doesn't go to understanding -- someone who fully understands something, e.g. that there's no credible evidence that any WMDs are in Iraq, can give a glib answer to reporters about how there's nothing proving there AREN'T any, or whatever.

So if "glib" was intended to convey that Lauer doesn't understand, it was wrong. If it was intended to convey that Lauer wasn't telling the whole story/was speaking in soundbites then it was OK.
ltl/fb is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 AM.