LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,689
0 members and 2,689 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-06-2006, 05:06 PM   #11
Not Bob
Moderator
 
Not Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
Whoa

Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I think that Libby and his attorneys were trying to get to classified information for his defense, and I think this new information about the authorization to leak to the press came out in the government's brief arguing that Libby doesn't need the classified information in order to adequately defend himself on the perjury claims.
I think that that's right.

Anyway, here's a new NYT article that lays out what appears to have happened.
Not Bob is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 AM.