LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,555
0 members and 2,555 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-27-2006, 06:59 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Oh boy.

Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
It seems like they would want to increase market share, or whatever. How are they not part of a cartel if they set their prices based on what OPEC says?
if Safeway sets the prices of lettuce to be, say, $1, and Kroger is aware of that, and sets the price of its lettuce at $1, instead of 99c, that is not unlawful or a violation of the antitrust laws.

If OPEC effectively sets the world price of oil, and Exxon sells at that price too, they're not part of the cartel. Now, this isn't how things operate in the real world. In the real world, no one sets price for oil, they supply a quantity. OPEC keeps the price high by agreeing to limit quantities. Exxon as a result supplies *more* not less oil as a result than they would in the absence of the cartel because they can get a higher price for it than without the cartel.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.