LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,284
0 members and 1,284 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-01-2006, 03:32 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
AMT

Quote:
Originally posted by taxwonk
People who need to live on the bulk of their income suffer more of the incindence of tax under either a flat tax that excludes dividends and capital gains or under a consumption tax.
On the former, I see your point (although I don't know if "suffering the incidence" accurately describes everyone paying the same percentage of their income in tax).

On the latter, there is no reason that one could not have a progressive consumption tax. Indeed, using IRAs/Roths/tax-sheltered savings accounts, in combination with progressive tax bracketing should resolve your concerns (assuming sufficient progressivity).
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.