LawTalkers
>
Regional Forums
>
SF/SV
Discussion of Firms and Life in SF/SV
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Calendar
Go to Page...
» Site Navigation
»
Homepage
»
Forums
»
Forum
>
User CP
>
FAQ
»
Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
»
Search Forums
»
Advanced Search
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Prev
Next
08-12-2003, 02:43 PM
#
11
ExceedinglyCheerful
Guest
Posts: n/a
The Answer is "No"
What does the case law say about physical evidence held by the government after termination of proceedings? Is it "taking" under the U.S. constitution? or just simply a breach of bailment? What does Ted think?
ExceedinglyCheerful
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
You
may not
post new threads
You
may not
post replies
You
may not
post attachments
You
may not
edit your posts
BB code
is
On
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Forum Rules
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
General Discussion
The Big Board
The Fashionable
Politics
Regional Forums
SF/SV
DC
Ohio
Texas
Boston
Canada
Chicago
Detroit
Florida
Los Angeles
Mid-Atlantic
Mid-West
Minnesota
New England
Pacific Northwest
Southern
Western/Southwest
New York
Miscellaneous
Mom & Dad, Esq.
Ex-Lawyers
Technology
Tailgate Party
Fitness
Soon to be Employed
Vacations
Language
Practice Areas
Clerks
In-House
IP
Non-Attorneys
Personal Injury
Tax
Welcome/News
Welcome/News
Safe Zone
Polls
Anon Posting
Powered by
vBadvanced
CMPS v3.0.1
All times are GMT -4. The time now is
07:17 AM
.
-- LawTalk Forums vBulletin 3 Style
-- vBulletin 2 Default
-- Ravio_Blue
-- Ravio_Orange
Contact Us
-
Lawtalkers
-
Top
Powered by:
vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By:
URLJet.com
Threaded Mode