LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 101
0 members and 101 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-30-2006, 04:53 PM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Right now the battle lines are drawn over tests. Not the type of test or how they administered. Just simply if we should have standardized tests at all. In California, many of those tests we took as kids have been removed. In California the California Teachers Association (and consequently the Democrat Party) are against any standardized testing. They are also against the firing of teachers unless they pretty much assault a student, they are for social promotion and against merit pay.

The only thing I agree with them is smaller class size.
I'd happily give conservatives all the tests they wanted if they'd commit to funding smaller class sizes. But you can't count on them to back up funding commitments they've made, as seen from the NCLB funding.

You may want to double check the positions on standardized testing. They've been around for ever, and few have challenged giving a day or two every two to three years for a battery of tests (though, what can I say, California's always different). It's what you tie to the tests that usually gets challenged.
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.