LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > Practice Areas > IP

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 920
0 members and 920 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2007, 01:53 AM   #1
mdjd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by patent_type
You inquired: "When responding, nontraverse, to a restriction requirement, is there any benefit to withdrawing nonelected claims vs. cancelling nonelected claims?"

I helpfully respond: yes.
Thanks PT! I really think we're starting to get somewhere now. This case is starting to gather some serious momentum. I'm tempted to expedite prosecution. Thoughts on this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2013, 06:32 PM   #2
mdjd
say hello to my little
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 45
Re: Restriction Requirement

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdjd View Post
Thanks PT! I really think we're starting to get somewhere now. This case is starting to gather some serious momentum. I'm tempted to expedite prosecution. Thoughts on this?
It's been almost 10 years, ladies. Can we get an answer or two on this?
__________________
friend
mdjd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2014, 11:10 PM   #3
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Restriction Requirement

Hi patent type! Glad yer not in jail!
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2014, 11:13 PM   #4
patent_type
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 8
Re: Restriction Requirement

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
Hi patent type! Glad yer not in jail!
I'm hopin' the statute of limitations has run
patent_type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2014, 11:11 PM   #5
patent_type
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 8
Re: Restriction Requirement

Is it a restriction between different inventions or between patentably distinct species?
patent_type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2018, 01:49 PM   #6
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Restriction Requirement

Quote:
Originally Posted by patent_type View Post
Is it a restriction between different inventions or between patentably distinct species?
am I on ignore?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.