Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!

[Penske_Account]

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?

I've had this drink. I do not like it. Too sweet.

Campari and soda?

[cheval de frise]

Originally Posted by taxwonk

One of the joys of being old is that I needn't worry about what is hip. I can stick to the classics. Martini or Basil Hayden in the winter; gin and tonic or margarita in the summer. Much like khakis and penny loafers, the 40s-60s have much to commend themselves aesthetically.

It's like you're my twin brother or something. Minus all the patent stuff, and with more cooking skill, but less hops.

CDF

[Penske_Account]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

I , much like a fish does not know it is wet.

If this is true, then how does one reconcile the foundation of thought underlying the phrase:

"like a fish out of water"

????

eta: first the pisco sour dies, and now this.....oh, the humanity!

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

One of my neighborhood bars sells a specialty drink called the Plymouth Punch -- Plymouth, tonic, grapefruit juice and Calvados. I can't wait for this to be my next summer drink, so I'm having it in the fall also.

I actually think that, despite the word "punch" in the name, with the addition of Calvados, this is a drink that will carry you through the fall and into the winter.

[cheval de frise]

Originally Posted by Penske_Account

If this is true, then how does one reconcile the foundation of thought underlying the phrase:

"like a fish out of water"

????

I think you can answer this. You're just not trying. (Maybe too much erotic auto-asphyxiation?)

CDF

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by Penske_Account

If this is true, then how does one reconcile the foundation of thought underlying the phrase:

"like a fish out of water"

The fish understands that something quite wrong is happening environmentally, but does not understand that the problem is that it is no longer wet.

Unless it is one of those fish that occasionally leaves the water, and therefore has the basis for comparison between wet and not-wet. But that fish does not really sync with the foundation of thought underlying the above-mentioned phrase in that, for such a fish, being out of the water is just a momentary break, a respite from wetness, iyw.

[taxwonk]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

One of my neighborhood bars sells a specialty drink called the Plymouth Punch -- Plymouth, tonic, grapefruit juice and Calvados. I can't wait for this to be my next summer drink, so I'm having it in the fall also.

Now that is a trendy drink I could see myself sampling.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Gattigap

Agreed. Colbert now has a machine at which to rage for political points.

But the character is about more than that. He can rage about all kinds of nonsense that his narcissistic character cares about (Bears, etc.) and it'll be funny.

To add to Jack's argument, I think Colbert's much better positioned than Stewart going forward. Stewart's bits were built around the notion that DC was hopeless.

Though generally speaking that has been, will be and is probably eternally true, at the moment, it's probably not going to be a popular form of humor for the sector of his audience that takes itself, and its politics, a lot more seriously than it ought to.

Colbert's more of a clown and he does a brilliant job of satirizing both the left and right in a fashion that keeps both on edge and wondering whether they're more in on or the butt of the joke, but always feeling like they have to smile and play along.

[Penske_Account]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

The fish understands that something quite wrong is happening environmentally, but does not understand that the problem is that it is no longer wet.

Unless it is one of those fish that occasionally leaves the water, and therefore has the basis for comparison between wet and not-wet. But that fish does not really sync with the foundation of thought underlying the above-mentioned phrase in that, for such a fish, being out of the water is just a momentary break, a respite from wetness, iyw.

On another note, are we sure the Pisco Sour is dead? I am getting really thirsty....

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally Posted by Penske_Account

Campari and soda?

DiSaronno on the rocks.

[taxwonk]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

To add to Jack's argument, I think Colbert's much better positioned than Stewart going forward. Stewart's bits were built around the notion that DC was hopeless.

Though generally speaking that has been, will be and is probably eternally true, at the moment, it's probably not going to be a popular form of humor for the sector of his audience that takes itself, and its politics, a lot more seriously than it ought to.

Colbert's more of a clown and he does a brilliant job of satirizing both the left and right in a fashion that keeps both on edge and wondering whether they're more in on or the butt of the joke, but always feeling like they have to smile and play along.

This debate is silly. Obama may have vision and a conscience, but he still has to govern, a process that has oft been compared to making sausage. He and his administration will fuck up a lot, the republicans will throw up stupid and partisan obstacles, and Nancy Pelosi will still be a wackadoo.

Both Colbert and Stewart will have grist enough for the mill.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Yes. he is in position for championships with just about any team he goes to, but he also knows it is possible for a team to fuck up and not put the bodies he needs around him. Right now it isn't that hard to sell against the Knicks (and Walsh, the Pacers had lots of talent over the years) as possibly fucking up like Cleveland. Although, over the next few years, what the LeBron needs to get to the top might get to be even less, and Walsh wil have some time to prove himself.

This assumes he won't be talking to Bosh and Stoudemire come 2010. Sell all you want right now. When the time comes, everyone will know exactly who wants to play with Lebron and where.

TM

[Penske_Account]

Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?

DiSaronno on the rocks.

Indeed, pass the pleasure around. My other motto.

[Penske_Account]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

This assumes he won't be talking to Bosh and Stoudemire come 2010. Sell all you want right now. When the time comes, everyone will know exactly who wants to play with Lebron and where.

TM

Four words, sports board.

[Not Bob]

Originally Posted by notcasesensitive

Awesomeness.

I was posting as a hate sock on the Gadget Board
That much is true
But even then I knew I'd find a much better schtick
From any poster named "Not You"
My five years on this board
Have been such good times
(Gatti's so sweet!)
But it's long past the time for my first FB song
For that, I guess I should blame you.