Congratulations Slave and Catrin!!!

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

can't you count the number of three hour blow jobs on zero hands? I thought that was something paigow invented.

No. A few times with X and a couple of times when super stoned I got blowjobs that might have hit the 3 hour mark.

TM

[Gattigap]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

No. A few times with X and a couple of times when super stoned I got blowjobs that might have hit the 3 hour mark.

TM

Presumably, the women worked in shifts. One worked, the others rested and to pass the time played pinochle.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally Posted by Jack Manfred

As this is gwinky's list, and as it does not contain any mention of a threesome, despite the fact that several months ago gwinky mentioned wanting to engage in a FMF with her current beau/everlasting gobstopper, I have to chide her for a lack of focus in her lovelife. Some (many? all?) of us are counting on gwinky to hold up her end of the vicarious bargain.

I miss fringey. Waaaahhhhhh!!!!!

You are right though, Jack. I have neglected this. The stumbling block I'm having is that I really think he's the love of my life and I don't want to wreck anything. It could be a good thing, but it could be a bad thing. I'm a little scared right now to find out. Unfortunately also, he's had a bit of turmoil in his life recently that has shaken his confidence, so while a threesome might be just what the doctor ordered, it might also not be. I'm kind of leaving the decision up to him right now.

[dtb]

Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall

The word you are looking for is "freaky."

It's the GWNC Freak Scale (and it should be sliding, because that sounds much more freaky).

TM

That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

[Adder]

Originally Posted by dtb

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

I'm not sure there is a tipping point. In my view at least, the higher the better, and anything under 6.5 or so on the GWINK scale is disappointing.

[John Phoenix]

Originally Posted by dtb

would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

Fortunate. My views would not morph at any point when going up that scale.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally Posted by dtb

That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

I think it's more important to have freaky parity in a relationship than it is to be on one side or the other of the freaky scale.

I am happiest when my partner is within one or two points of me on the freaky scale. Anything else leaves me feeling just like a freak and not particularly freaky.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by dtb

That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

well our "slut" scale crosses gwnc's at 9, at least for me. if someone I'm dating needs 10 sessions (as opposed to orgasms) a day she'll be needing to cheat on me. but below that is all good.

the main thing to me though is personality and her eyes, she has to have piercing eyes.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by dtb

That's IT! Yes!! The Freaky Scale -- that's much better because "slut" can be misinterpreted.

Someone else said this I think, but I'd still be curious to know the answer -- would you consider yourself fortunate or cursed (or somewhere in between) to have a partner who was toward the upper reaches of the Freaky Scale? At what point (if any) would your view morph from "blessed" to "cursed"?

Good question. Everyone wants someone who is sexually skilled and adventurous. The question is, does everyone want someone who became sexually skilled because they fucked 500 people and got lots of exposure to different stuff elsewhere?

To be honest, I would rather my partner say, "You dirty bastard. I've never tried that before, but let's do it! I'm game." Or, "Something I've always fantasized about I would like to try with you." You don't want to hear, "That's your dirtiest fantasy? Shit, I did that with like two dozen guys already. Hell, I dedicated a whole year of my life to that one and it wasn't even in my Top 5 Dirtiest Years."

Obviously everyone is different and I'm sure a bunch of posters will say they don't feel that way and what happened before doesn't mean anything and they're just appreciative of good sex with the person they love. But I would be lying if I said that wouldn't bother me. In reality, you have to accept the fact that you are probably never going to be someone's first in every freaky category and you can appreciate some skills your partner has picked up somewhere else. And everyone has a different limit on what they're mature or secure enough to handle.

So, in short, I would consider myself fortunate to have an SO who was high on the Freaky Scale, but got there with me. I probably wouldn't make someone who had already conquered the Freaky Scale before I met them my SO, but I would count myself fortunate to fuck around with them for awhile.

TM

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen

I think it's more important to have freaky parity in a relationship than it is to be on one side or the other of the freaky scale.

I am happiest when my partner is within one or two points of me on the freaky scale. Anything else leaves me feeling just like a freak and not particularly freaky.

I agree with you 100%.

[dtb]

Originally Posted by greatwhitenorthchick

I agree with you 100%.

ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.

[Adder]

Originally Posted by dtb

ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.

I agree on the first point, but not so much on the second. I really don't care if I am there for the first of her freaky experiences, or really what came before, as long as she has the good sense to be tacticful when discussing it.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by dtb

ABSOLUTELY. She makes a very good point -- as does TM, with the "freaky, yes, but let's get there more-or-less together" point.

I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.

[ThurgreedMarshall]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.

There is a huge gap between what I'm saying and your example.

TM

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

I'm surprised by you and thurgreed feeling that way. I would sort of want a SO to have had a slutty night or two, so she iisn't wondering if she is missing something.

my sister married the first boy she dated. where ever they are, they got there together, but I believe they're miserable and the lack of experience is a main factor.

A slutty night or two is one thing. Rock of Love Bus vagina-shot skankiness takes it to a whole new level. I wouldn't want to date anyone at that level or close to it. For his professed tolerance, I'm not sure that Adder would either. There's sexually adventurous and then there's a complete lack of self-respect.