Welcome back E/O, leagl and Fringey: no one say the name "Penske" 3 times in a row - Page 75

Hank Chinaski · 10-21-2009, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1436

Act now and you're building can star in Red Dawn, too.

http://jalopnik.com/5384554/red-dawn...wntown-detroit

i been to restaurants in the hutongs. those bastards take over I am not eating a coney island

oh. http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm

cheval de frise · 10-21-2009, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske

Is that right? I may have to watch that tonight to check on our respective recall.

"Pinned to" is the correct historical usage. I was just describing what would happen in the hot tub.*

Besides, you can't tell us that a single hot tub encounter would cause you to commit long-term.

CDF

*note the re: line...

Atticus Grinch · 10-21-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

I thought that NY had a statute giving people rights in things like images of public art and buildings. I remember a bunch of photographers complaining about it a while ago.

But then, you're not in NY, right?

I would love to see how they made THAT constitutional.

cheval de frise · 10-21-2009, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

I would love to see how they made THAT constitutional.

Wasn't there a case about this involving the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland? (Yes, I'm too lazy to look it up.)

CDF

Fugee · 10-21-2009, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

Stay away from the jacuzzi with him. He farts in it to make the bubbles.

So does Penske.

PresentTense Pirate Penske · 10-21-2009, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cheval de frise

"Pinned to" is the correct historical usage. I was just describing what would happen in the hot tub.*

Besides, you can't tell us that a single hot tub encounter would cause you to commit long-term.

CDF

*note the re: line...

Got it. Indeed. And fwiw, I once had a one night Tombs encounter that ended up in a long term commitment. I'm committable like that.

LessinSF · 10-21-2009, 05:00 PM

Cletus Miller · 10-21-2009, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

I thought that NY had a statute giving people rights in things like images of public art and buildings. I remember a bunch of photographers complaining about it a while ago.

But then, you're not in NY, right?

Didn't the owners of the Chrysler Building (try to) trademark it's image, theoretically limiting NYC skyline shots that didn't involve paying for the use of the Chrysler image? I seem to recall some pix airbrushing out Chrysler to avoid the issue, but maybe I'm imagining things.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) · 10-21-2009, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch

I would love to see how they made THAT constitutional.

Argued it was necessary in a post-9/11 world?

BTW, did IM Pei claim copyright for the R&RHoF?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 10-21-2009, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

Argued it was necessary in a post-9/11 world?

BTW, did IM Pei claim copyright for the R&RHoF?

Adder, I look at all of the above research that needs to be done, and I think it's going to be a long night for you.

Why don't you ask that paralegal to stay to help? Put it on Hank's number.

cheval de frise · 10-21-2009, 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Why don't you ask that paralegal to stay to help? Put it on Hank's number.

Jenny Jenny, who can I turn to? 867-5309.

CDF

Hank Chinaski · 10-21-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Adder, I look at all of the above research that needs to be done, and I think it's going to be a long night for you.

Why don't you ask that paralegal to stay to help? Put it on Hank's number.

I'm not so sure I'd ask adder to do research on IP issues. my "discussion" with him on PB about the need for patent reform caused me to promise never to comment on any IP issue on these boards, ever again.

cheval de frise · 10-21-2009, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

Argued it was necessary in a post-9/11 world?

BTW, did IM Pei claim copyright for the R&RHoF?

Don't remember re IM Pei; I think the court case was framed as a trademark dispute. If memory serves, the appeals court said you can't just ban all commercial sales of any picture of a famous building. But it might be possible to protect one or two unique views/pictures from third-party commercial exploitation if they're being consistently used by the building's owner to market what the building offers.

Usual disclaimer: this is not legal advice.

CDF

Replaced_Texan · 10-21-2009, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cletus Miller

Didn't the owners of the Chrysler Building (try to) trademark it's image, theoretically limiting NYC skyline shots that didn't involve paying for the use of the Chrysler image? I seem to recall some pix airbrushing out Chrysler to avoid the issue, but maybe I'm imagining things.

I vaguely recall something about the New York, New York hotel in Vegas having to pay a shit ton of license fees for all of the iconic images on their building.

Cletus Miller · 10-21-2009, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I vaguely recall something about the New York, New York hotel in Vegas having to pay a shit ton of license fees for all of the iconic images on their building.

Article--from 1998--regarding the trend of trademarking building images with a couple mentions of court cases.