» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 940 |
0 members and 940 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
06-26-2013, 01:28 PM
|
#3016
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
so does DOMA being out means a married gay couple can now file joint income? if so how can it possible be fair that some states allow marriage and others do not? maybe the next legal challenge?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 02:59 PM
|
#3017
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Podunkville
Posts: 6,034
|
Jesus saves, but Espo scores on the rebound (just not this year).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
And don't forget the City of Bahston.
First they get to see Patty Kane skate the Cup around Bahstan Gahdan. Then they get to see their tight end get switched to wide receiver.
|
A great series, especially if -- like me -- you love great goaltending. The only Bruin I feel bad for is Rusk (I do feel semi-bad for Jagr, because I love geezers playing in the finals, but only "semi-bad" because unlike previous geezers in the finals a la Bourque or Andreychuk, he's won the Cup before).
And I still wish someone would have smacked Brad Marchand. The weasely smug look of his just annoys the crap out of me.
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 03:23 PM
|
#3018
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Jesus saves, but Espo scores on the rebound (just not this year).
When do we get polygamy?
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 04:16 PM
|
#3019
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 04:18 PM
|
#3020
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,568
|
Re: Jesus saves, but Espo scores on the rebound (just not this year).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Bob
And I still wish someone would have smacked Brad Marchand. The weasely smug look of his just annoys the crap out of me.
|
2. Oddly enough he is supposed to be one of the nicest guys on the planet off the ice.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 04:19 PM
|
#3021
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,568
|
Re: Jesus saves, but Espo scores on the rebound (just not this year).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
When do we get polygamy?
|
Lease and return.
Whoa, that was supposed to be for bimmerfest.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 04:38 PM
|
#3022
|
Random Syndicate (admin)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,280
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
ESPN3 has improved markedly since the World Cup in 2010.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 05:17 PM
|
#3023
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere between Moon and New York City
Posts: 88
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
so does DOMA being out means a married gay couple can now file joint income? if so how can it possible be fair that some states allow marriage and others do not? maybe the next legal challenge?
|
That's what it means (including refund claims for any open tax years if applicable). H & R Block should be celebrating the DOMA decision. (Interestingly, gay couples where both are high earners might have been better off filing as separate single individuals rather than as either married filing jointly or married filing separately, but I doubt the IRS will suddenly start auditing same-sex spouses' returns for the last three years.) As for the fairness issue, Scalia seems to think it has yet to be decided; I think he's probably right about that (if nothing else).
__________________
"Our opinions are at best provisional hypotheses."
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 05:29 PM
|
#3024
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Jesus saves, but Espo scores on the rebound (just not this year).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
When do we get polygamy?
|
Who would want it?
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 06:29 PM
|
#3025
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Thought experiment:
In 2012, the median age at first marriage in the U.S. was 28.6 for men and 26.6 for women — at or near all-time highs for both, and a consistent upward trend. Assume a negligible number of same-sex marriages in the 2012 statistics.
Let "L" be the median age of all first marriages of women marrying women going forward.
Let "G" be the median age of all first marriages of men marrying men going forward.
Give your predictions for L and G, both as a figure and as an expected trend (if any).
I'll give my answers if two or more people respond. For sake of reference, all-time low for women was 20.1 (1956) and for men was 22.5 (1956 and 1959).
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 06:40 PM
|
#3026
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
Thought experiment:
In 2012, the median age at first marriage in the U.S. was 28.6 for men and 26.6 for women — at or near all-time highs for both, and a consistent upward trend. Assume a negligible number of same-sex marriages in the 2012 statistics.
Let "L" be the median age of all first marriages of women marrying women going forward.
Let "G" be the median age of all first marriages of men marrying men going forward.
Give your predictions for L and G, both as a figure and as an expected trend (if any).
I'll give my answers if two or more people respond. For sake of reference, all-time low for women was 20.1 (1956) and for men was 22.5 (1956 and 1959).
|
I'm sorry, but can someone who has GWNC or Abba's cells call one of them and ask if they have any new fuck stories they can share?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 06:59 PM
|
#3027
|
Hello, Dum-Dum.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,117
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm sorry, but can someone who has GWNC or Abba's cells call one of them and ask if they have any new fuck stories they can share?
|
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."
— Eleanor Roosevelt
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 07:32 PM
|
#3028
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch
"Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people."
— Eleanor Roosevelt
|
Here's the thing. Good sex is an event full of ideas involving people. All three at once.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 07:37 PM
|
#3029
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
06-26-2013, 07:42 PM
|
#3030
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan
ESPN3 has improved markedly since the World Cup in 2010.
|
Or broadband speeds have.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|