» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 147 |
| 0 members and 147 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
07-19-2013, 09:15 PM
|
#1
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
Speaking of which, I opposed a particularly strong MSJ and won on very thin facts. In the decision, the judge misstated the facts from the other defendant's particularly weak motion and distinguished defendant 2's cases in denying defendant 1's motion. Defendant 2's motion is yet undecided. Normally say who cares but I do not want these misquotes to be binding later.
Do I move to clarify? Write a letter? Defendant 2 has the bigger pocket.
|
There will be a request to reconsider. At that point you explain why the bad quotes ae meaningless and why your guy must win.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
07-19-2013, 10:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,570
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
There will be a request to reconsider. At that point you explain why the bad quotes ae meaningless and why your guy must win.
|
My thought IF there was such a request but it may not be coming.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
07-22-2013, 04:38 PM
|
#3
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
07-23-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#4
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
07-23-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
|
|
|
07-24-2013, 10:48 AM
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
|
Three amusing takeaways.
1. Who in the industry didn't see this coming seven to ten years ago? That could only accrue from willful ignorance or blissful self-delusion.
2. Why is this only focused on big firms? Medium sized firms are also getting hammered.
3. When was law - big, small, or medium, all practice specialties - a collegial, communal environment, in which people were more interested in being part of a "profession" than making money like any other business? That Disneyland must've been a hell of a swell time to be any kind of professional. Docs would've whistled as they biked to work, accountants would have clicked their heels like Gene Kelly in Singing in the Rain as they rushed down the sidewalks to their fascinating days of preparing corporate tax returns... Prozac would never have been invented. And of course, unsolicited fellatio from a Sophia Vergara lookalike for everyone, at least once a day.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
07-24-2013, 12:26 PM
|
#7
|
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Three amusing takeaways.
1. Who in the industry didn't see this coming seven to ten years ago? That could only accrue from willful ignorance or blissful self-delusion.
2. Why is this only focused on big firms? Medium sized firms are also getting hammered.
3. When was law - big, small, or medium, all practice specialties - a collegial, communal environment, in which people were more interested in being part of a "profession" than making money like any other business? That Disneyland must've been a hell of a swell time to be any kind of professional. Docs would've whistled as they biked to work, accountants would have clicked their heels like Gene Kelly in Singing in the Rain as they rushed down the sidewalks to their fascinating days of preparing corporate tax returns... Prozac would never have been invented. And of course, unsolicited fellatio from a Sophia Vergara lookalike for everyone, at least once a day.
|
Response on the Big Board.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 01:00 PM
|
#8
|
|
Flaired.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Out with Lumbergh.
Posts: 9,954
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Three amusing takeaways.
1. Who in the industry didn't see this coming seven to ten years ago? That could only accrue from willful ignorance or blissful self-delusion.
2. Why is this only focused on big firms? Medium sized firms are also getting hammered.
3. When was law - big, small, or medium, all practice specialties - a collegial, communal environment, in which people were more interested in being part of a "profession" than making money like any other business? That Disneyland must've been a hell of a swell time to be any kind of professional. Docs would've whistled as they biked to work, accountants would have clicked their heels like Gene Kelly in Singing in the Rain as they rushed down the sidewalks to their fascinating days of preparing corporate tax returns... Prozac would never have been invented. And of course, unsolicited fellatio from a Sophia Vergara lookalike for everyone, at least once a day.
|
I worked at the profiled firm. At one of the less profitable satellite offices. Not much in the article surprises me. I was pretty sure for the last few years I was practicing law that the big firm model was going to have to readjust itself in a major way or it would be shrinking/going away. What's the incentive for an associate to ever stick around and try to make partner anymore? There certainly wasn't one when I was an associate 5+ years ago, and I don't see it getting more likely...
__________________
See you later, decorator.
|
|
|
07-25-2013, 10:36 AM
|
#9
|
|
It's all about me.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Enough about me. Let's talk about you. What do you think of me?
Posts: 6,004
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
|
Why does this article act like this only ever happened for the first time in 2007?
And the term "Lathamed" was not coined then, but decades before.
__________________
Always game for a little hand-to-hand chainsaw combat.
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 09:01 AM
|
#10
|
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,122
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen
Why does this article act like this only ever happened for the first time in 2007?
And the term "Lathamed" was not coined then, but decades before.
|
Liely because the author is under 30 and only recently got axed by Mayer Brown.
LessinSeyðisfjörður, Iceland
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
07-26-2013, 04:39 PM
|
#11
|
|
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
|
Re: Towards A Virtual Williamsburg!
Quote:
Originally Posted by bold_n_brazen
Why does this article act like this only ever happened for the first time in 2007?
And the term "Lathamed" was not coined then, but decades before.
|
Not only was it coined decades before, but it doesn't even mean what they say it does. Being Lathamed originally meant that you had been laid off because the firm couldn't keep you busy, but Latham would deny letting anyone go on anything other than performance issues.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
|
|
|
07-23-2013, 08:03 PM
|
#12
|
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
PB x-post
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|