LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 226
0 members and 226 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-09-2015, 09:38 AM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: So, New Yorkers

Quote:
Originally Posted by BackInTheNewYorkGroove View Post
I disagree (and I voted for Comrade de Blasio). I think what bothered New Yorkers enough to elect a guy who was number 11 in a 10 candidate poll at the start of the campaign was the abuse of stop and frisk (one of the tools in the broad concept of broken windows).

The focus on quality of life issues (squeegee men, turnstile jumping, open container/open drug use, etc.) helped stop more dangerous crimes - the turnstile jumper who had a .45 in his backpack, the pot smoker who had an open warrant for assault, the squeegee guy serving as distraction for robbery, etc.

But the continued focus on precincts meeting goals and numbers led to harassment and under reporting more recently. Street cops had a quota (denied by the NYPD but confirmed on recordings) and captains were hassled if they had too many higher level crimes in their precincts.

This current brouhaha is underlined by a combination of the union trying to strong arm the mayor on their contract talks (the cops have done this sort of thing to every mayor since Peter Stuyvesant), anger that the guy who campaigned as a police reformer won, and the people who hate de Blasio (the Post, Rudy, the 1% who didn't like his tax proposal).

And as to Adder's question, I think that the police union may be overplaying their hand - ignoring the request of the family of the second murdered cop not to turn the funeral into a political protest was bad enough, but the slowdown is pissing people off. I think the union's request to have Bill Clinton mediate is a sign that they realize that, too.
Stop and frisk is indefensible. Quotas are indefensible. But technically, their emergence does dovetail with a drop in crime. Other factors are of course part of that decrease, but Adder's suggestion that broken windows has been proven not to have been a contributing factor is not true. However much I want Adder to be right on this point, that debate is not settled.

The Union's behavior came off as that of petulant children -- bitching and whining because they were being reprimanded. Turning their backs on DeBlasio did nothing but reinforce the public's suspicion far too many cops are far too many rungs down the IQ and maturity ladders than public servants carrying pistols ought to be.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.