LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,730
0 members and 2,730 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 03:04 PM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-09-2015, 01:11 PM   #11
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall View Post
If you take the worst-case scenario as fact in the Patriots case, having your quarterback instruct your equipment managers to deflate balls after the refs have inspected them and then engaging in a cover-up, destroying evidence, and refusing to cooperate with the investigation puts you in a different category, no? I think that's the type of shit that the conduct detrimental language is supposed to cover.

TM
I can see the conduct detrimental covering the underlined part, although other than for Goodell's made-up claims in that regard I don't see that as occurring - not sure what "cover up" there was, Brady provided all the texts to Wells's satisfaction, as noted in the report, declining only to provide his phone physically (destroyed after Wells was done), and the only refusal to cooperate was not making the deflator available for a fifth interview, or something like that. Bear in mind that in every other instance of such obstruction, the league issued only a fine.
__________________
[Dictated but not read]
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 PM.