LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,861
0 members and 2,861 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 12,534, 02-14-2026 at 03:04 PM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-09-2016, 09:53 PM   #11
Icky Thump
Registered User
 
Icky Thump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,574
Re: In SJ opps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Bob View Post
Personally, I'm more of a fan of "as if."

For example: "Hazel Agnes O'Leary ("Plaintiff") alleges that Piggly Wiggly Highway 64 Podunk LLC ("the Store") was on constructive notice of the puddle of lardo that she slipped in based upon a purported admission made by an unidentified teen-aged employee of the Store after the fall. The statement -- 'Bro, I totally missed that goo on my last mop dance. My bad.' -- appears nowhere in the record other than in the Plaintiff's Complaint and in her own self-serving affidavit in opposition to the Store's motion. Did the Plaintiff submit sufficient evidence that the Store had 'constructive notice' of the lardo? As if."
Nice. I legit wrote this in a brief today.

Piggly Wiggly's failure to comply with discovery includes producing a person who knew less than Jon Snow (who did “know some things”) . . . .
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
Icky Thump is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 PM.