» Site Navigation |
|
|
|
» Online Users: 175 |
| 0 members and 175 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
 |
|
10-02-2016, 07:50 PM
|
#1951
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
In retrospect, and considering how dead this board is, perhaps it was a mistake to have ran off Ppnyc? Who knows how many fun adventures she has had these past years. I blame Thurgreed.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 10-02-2016 at 08:04 PM..
|
|
|
|
10-02-2016, 07:54 PM
|
#1952
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,570
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
In retrospect, and considering how dead this board, perhaps it was a mistake to have ran off Ppnyc? Who knows how many fun adventures she has had these past years. I blame Thurgreed.
|
Im here now
http://forums.compuserve.com/discuss...s?redirCnt=1&=
All the rage.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
|
|
10-03-2016, 03:57 PM
|
#1953
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2016, 01:33 PM
|
#1954
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
|
Re: an actual fashion post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Bob
After reading this:
I'd have to respectfully disagree.
|
Underwear only enables one to get lazy with self-control. We of the commando persuasion keep the sphincters taut.
Re boxers specifically, though I used to wear them about the house casually at times, with clothes, they're basically shorts for wearing pants (or other shorts). You're already wearing shorts or pants, the function of which is to cover up in a socially acceptable, perhaps even stylish, manner. You don't need shorts for wearing pants, or shorts, any more than you need contacts for wearing glasses.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2016, 03:13 PM
|
#1955
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: an actual fashion post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Underwear only enables one to get lazy with self-control. We of the commando persuasion keep the sphincters taut.
Re boxers specifically, though I used to wear them about the house casually at times, with clothes, they're basically shorts for wearing pants (or other shorts). You're already wearing shorts or pants, the function of which is to cover up in a socially acceptable, perhaps even stylish, manner. You don't need shorts for wearing pants, or shorts, any more than you need contacts for wearing glasses.
|
I'm always jel of men whose mommy taught them to wipe completely 
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
|
|
10-05-2016, 09:53 PM
|
#1956
|
|
Wearing the cranky pants
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pulling your finger
Posts: 7,122
|
Em Lives
__________________
Boogers!
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2016, 10:31 AM
|
#1957
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
|
Re: Em Lives
eh
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
|
|
|
|
10-09-2016, 07:44 AM
|
#1958
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,570
|
Re: Okinawa Bleg
Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF
Anyone been to Okinawa? If so, thoughts and suggestions are invited. I will be there for about a week over Thanksgiving. And, yes, I have seen the Bourdain episode. Thanks,
|
Board is dead but this is close enough
http://en.rocketnews24.com/2015/04/0...ouse-in-osaka/
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
|
|
10-09-2016, 02:51 PM
|
#1959
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: Okinawa Bleg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
|
Saw a JetBlue ad on the #2 Train- "most legroom in coach!" What the fuck you always bitchin for?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
|
|
10-11-2016, 04:41 PM
|
#1960
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 04:47 PM
|
#1961
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20
|
|
|
|
|
10-14-2016, 11:29 AM
|
#1962
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Yesterday's Top 20
|
|
|
|
|
10-14-2016, 11:40 AM
|
#1963
|
|
[intentionally omitted]
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
|
Top 20 (All gifs edition)
|
|
|
|
|
10-15-2016, 05:40 PM
|
#1964
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,570
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
So Jackie Fox and Anabella Sciorrs showed up in FB as friends of friends.
__________________
gothamtakecontrol
|
|
|
|
|
10-15-2016, 11:17 PM
|
#1965
|
|
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
|
Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icky Thump
So Jackie Fox and Anabella Sciorrs showed up in FB as friends of friends.
|
The bass player from some dumb 80s band is my friend on FB.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
