I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

I blame 538 more than anything because the 3rd party voters felt safe. Hil had it anyway, so they were safe.

But then someone (maybe Less whom I met in November, being in SF as someone from Michigan, man we got called out (not by less) and had to talk about what happened) said there is no showing that 3rd party voters would break more for Hil than Trump. That strikes me as crazy talk.

Question- can you say who you would have voted for between the two?

Question- have you been out of state since the election, in a blue state? You get questioned?

edit- and I'm not dogging on you. seriously interested

1. I asked myself that a million times before the election and came up with "none of the above." The best I can say now is, knowing what I knew then, I was inclined toward her as the safer bet. If I knew then what I know now (Trump has actually created an opportunity for me based on a policy he's touting), I'd have been swayed by my own interests.

2. Yes. Many times. Most people are polite in questioning. My stock answer is, "I have trouble with the man's social agenda, and I'm leery of his trade policies. I liked her social policies, but I had trouble with much of the rest of her agenda. But the world isn't going to end either way, and I'd have been fine with either of them."