LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,125
0 members and 2,125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-07-2017, 01:39 PM   #11
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: L'affaire Rice

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Some anti-reg people fit that definition. Some don't.
I've yet to meet anyone who professes to be anti-reg who isn't completely full of shit and/or totally ignorant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
I'm leery of regs and laws designed to change behavior by incentives. A good example of a silly law that ought to be banished is the ACA tax on tanning beds. In theory, this is great. We're all against skin cancer. But these are largely cash businesses. You've just pushed an entire industry into more robust tax evasion (many were already engaged in it, no doubt). Somewhere, a revenue agent is poring over the books of a tanning salon, wasting his time to collect $5,000.00 in taxes on under-reported income and fines when he'd be doing much more for the treasury by chasing foreign bank accounts.
I think you overstate your knowledge of the tanning bed business based on what you think is true. I get my head lasered and the place that does it shares space with a tanning salon. I've been there many many times and I have never seen anyone pay with cash. But, whatever. I don't really care.

If you think a tax assessment levied on tanning beds with the aim of offsetting the costs all other insured people have to pay because certain dumbasses don't give a shit about clear health risks are a waste of time because some tanning salons cheat, I'm not sure how you think any tax stick-incentives work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
And how much easier would land development be if you didn't have five different fed, state, and municipal agencies assessing your project. It's welfare for lawyers and ex-politicos now "consulting."
I'm sure it would be much easier. But I'd rather live in a place where it is difficult to build shit that isn't up to code.*

Your welfare comment is just stupid.

TM

*Sounds like you're advocating for all-encompassing federal building standards enforced by big government for efficiency sake. But that's unpossible.

Last edited by ThurgreedMarshall; 04-07-2017 at 02:03 PM..
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 AM.