Quote:
Originally Posted by ThurgreedMarshall
I'm saying that there should have been an ethics hearing/investigation in which he could have defended himself.
|
I do not know know what "should have been" means in this context.
I take you to be saying that your sense of fairness tells you that some process is due before he is punished. I don't disagree.
But he wasn't punished and the question was a political one, not a legal one. Politically, he was in an untenable position. Fairness and due process don't come into it.