LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,295
0 members and 2,295 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-13-2019, 07:18 PM   #11
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Re: Northam, Warren, Fairfax...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
More than half of his Senate caucus (some of who expressed no opinion because they were on the ethics committee) called for him to resign.
And some of them expressed that they rushed to judgment later and wished they hadn't just jumped in. Either way, I'm not sure why you or any of them is resistant to an investigation or letting him have his day at a hearing if the outcome would be the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
As did a nontrivial number of his constituents.
Hahahaha. I can't believe you included this. Stop it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
When you lose the majority of your colleague (to be fair, in no small pet because your presence hurts them politically) and a bunch of constituents...
Yes. You said this in this very post already.

TM

Last edited by ThurgreedMarshall; 02-13-2019 at 07:40 PM..
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.