Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The battle is political, whether people will find out what Trump and his campaign did.
Mueller found collusion, you brick. As multiple people have pointed out, we know about it from Mueller's work. "Collusion" is not a crime, as you have pointed out. Mueller did not find sufficient evidence to bring criminal charges for conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, something different from and narrower than "collusion."
|
If it’s political, you lost already, you naive shmuck. Let’s talk about Avenatti.
If you don’t understand the only thing left for you given the political climate and D/R split in the Senate is proof Barr misrepresented Mueller in regard to ability to criminally charge, and win, you’re in Crazyland. I’ve no interest in wading into that place.
If you think “collusion” sticks without a criminal charge, you’re delusional.
Drive this through that brick between your ears: Go to SDNY and nail this guy in a forum where you can win. This Russiagate thing is Over.
Don’t get pissy. You asked for the pragmatic take. I’m being polite.
Threaded Mode