LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,566
0 members and 2,566 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-23-2019, 12:00 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Franken Revisted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Yes, he handled it well at the time and there was a way back if he wanted it, but this isn't it.
Is he not allowed to reply to interview questions about it? He must go away and not speak of it? The guy cannot Monday morning quarterback himself?

He's not whining. That's a characterization you are using to avoid discussing substance. You're effectively branding him as shrill, or hysterical.

And the whole point of the piece is his not handling the situation well. Because he couldn't handle the situation at all. Franken was sacrificed by his party which was at the time in fear of a moral panic. He had almost no control and took the only course he thought he had open to him. Now, looking back, he thinks he could have responded differently and perhaps kept his seat. I think he's wrong. But either way, his interview on the subject is both enlightening as to what happened and insightful regarding a strange political moment, and the reprehensible acts of his fellow senators towards him. I'm glad I read it. I'm not so glad I read that tripe you offered from Salon.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.