LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,576
0 members and 1,576 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-04-2019, 12:03 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Doesn’t Matter Who Wins the K Race; We’re All the Same

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
Did you all see the Leo Strine paper? https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019...le-capitalism/
That’s a mouthful, but well done. Strine is the man, of course, so that’s expected.

But re arbitration, can’t we just require it be explicitly bargained for? Say in a credit agreement, offer two rates. One for agreeing to arbitrate. Another higher rate for refusing to do so. Or in a brokerage contract, fees of XX for trades with agreement to arbitrate, fees of XXX for refusing to agree to arbitrate.

I’ve always wondered how arb clauses survive an argument of lack of consideration based solely on language in the agreement stating consideration for everything in the agreement is acknowledged.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 AM.