LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,806
0 members and 1,806 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-06-2019, 04:02 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Whistling down the alley

Quote:
Oh, bullshit.
Prepositions. They'll sabotage your comeback every time.

Quote:
There isn't any evidence of that, and you know it.
There's absolutely evidence adequate enough to assert there might have been coordination or orchestration. A similar thing happened with this Russiagate situation, which you might recall. There was all of this discussion about collusion and everyone looked for it, but in the end, there weren't facts sufficiently tying Trump to Russia. But guess what? A ton of people still believe it happened, or think it might have happened. Scant evidence - but just enough to justify a sincere investigation - coupled with a relentless media campaign (spearheaded by Schiff, who did endless TV appearances) has created a "question of fact" regarding whether Trump "colluded" with Russians.

The fact that Schiff said he didn't know about the complaint, then later changed his story, is more than enough for any decent lawyer to be able to argue the following to a judge:

"Your Honor, there's convenient timing, and a witness with motive to possibly hide facts telling two different stories. We need discovery on this."
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.