LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,157
1 members and 4,156 guests
Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-24-2020, 11:59 AM   #11
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Registered User
 
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown
Posts: 20,182
Re: Appellate issue?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
The judge apparently spoke for about an hour about what Stone did, and I would wager that Sebby spent no more than twenty seconds reading a third-account before he decided that he use of the phrase "cover up" is a scandal. Contrarian!

Also, what she said last night: "judges cannot be ‘biased’ and need not be disqualified if the views they express are based on what they learned while doing the job they were appointed to do."

Bonus conclusion: "At bottom, given the absence of any factual or legal support for the motion for disqualification, the pleading appears to be nothing more than an attempt to use the Court’s docket to disseminate a statement for public consumption that has the words 'judge' and 'biased' in it."
I am continually amazed at how long-winded low information people can be.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.