Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
But your first two posts (As I read them) consisted entirely of you raging at him for raging at the other side, and criticizing him for not including disclaimers acknowledging that the other side fundamentally disagrees with him.
|
Here's my first post:
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...3825#post53825
Here's my second post:
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...3991#post53991
Edited to add - well, the damn post link doesn't work on this one, so you have to scroll down. Shit.)
I dissent. Raging? In response to the pure vituperative shit he was banging out? Not even close.
(Adding): The evil of which he complained involved a woman having to listen while some med-pro reads a script about the evils of abortion. Quelle horror! I was pointing out that "the other side" is trying to prevent what is, to them the murder of thousands of defenseless humans. My point was, crying about his evil of choice is going to have very little impact on people who truly believe that abortion is murder. If he's trying to convince someone to change their minds, he's very bad at it.
Threaded Mode